ProjectsLibraryNotice BoardAbout UsContact Us

Scientific Connoisseurs and other Intermediaries – Mavens, Pundits and Critics

Dates and Times
11-12 March 2004
Location
Minster Lovell Mill, Oxfordshire
Travel Details
Notes and Other Info

For work arising from the workshop, see

www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/expertise

 

Date Posted // 16.09.2004
 
Agenda
A connoisseur, as applied to connoisseurship in art, antiques, or fine food and wine, is one who has cultivated a specialised expertise concerning the quality, provenance, cultural significance and financial value of the artefacts or products of a particular domain or discipline and the means by which they are produced. An integral part of connoisseurship is an ability to judge the particular distinguishing characteristics of artists who have produced the work in question so as to be able to engage in authoritative attribution. This requires detailed knowledge of the artistic production process and the strengths and weaknesses of particular artists in relation to it. Connoisseurs, however, are not themselves practitioners of what they judge, but this lack of practice is not believed to undermine their authority to judge practitioners or to communicate their judgements to wider publics. Given the current public mistrust of many of the processes and outcomes of science and technology, it is pertinent to ask to what extent connoisseurship could (or already does) exist in relation to science, how it could be fostered and maintained, and the role that connoisseurs of science would then have, as public intellectuals, in the wider legitimisation (or not, as the case may be) of particular science-based processes and products. This workshop will bring together a small number of reflexive members of four communities: scientists and technologists, social scientists concerned with issues of trust, legitimacy and authority in science, those responsible for the wider governance of science, and connoisseurs from other domains. It is hoped that the workshop will contribute to the literature in the form of a book or journal special issues.
Agenda
Workshop Programme


Thursday 11 March


1030 Bus pick-up from Oxford Station


1100 - 1130 Registration and coffee (Malthouse)


1130 - 1300 Theme 1- Learning about Connoisseurship and other Intermediary Forms (Malthouse)

What can we learn from other domains, or from institutional intermediaries in S&T, about

- purposes of connoisseurship;

- roles and styles of mediation;

- sources of legitimacy and authority, construction of evidence and argument;

- the identification and management of conflicts of interest

How does our more general understanding of different forms of expertise help us to interrogate and position connoisseurship?


1300 - 1400 Lunch (The Old Swan)


1400 - 1530Theme 2 session 1 – Defining Opportunities for Scientific Connoisseurship

What can we learn about the history of scientific connoisseurship?

What are the current problems of science and society to which scientific connoisseurship is seen as a contributory solution?

How are these distinctive of our scientific culture and our times?

Does the agenda for scientific connoisseurship look different in a globalised world with a division of labour in knowledge production?

How can we recognise scientific connoisseurship in action, and how do we deal with potentially conflicting roles that we might demand of it? What might be the unintended social consequences?


1530 - 1630 Tea and coffee – pick up room keys


1630 - 1800 Theme 2 session 2 - Defining Opportunities for Scientific Connoisseurship

What are the principal forms of scientific connoisseurship and what do we understand about popular or professional scientific connoisseurship?

How is scientific connoisseurship socially constructed – or limited?

What sort of contributions can we expect from it – does it lead or lag behind social debate on the issues or redefined issues? Does it have an anticipatory role in relation discontinuities of subject and method?

In these respects how does it relate to other forms of mediation between science and its publics /different stakeholders in science and technology? In particular, what relation does it have to the broader participation of the public with S&T, and to the development and delivery of public policy?


1845 -1930 Pre-dinner drinks (Bar area, the Old Swan)


1930 - 2100 Dinner (The Old Swan)



Friday 12 March


0800 - 0900 Breakfast (The Old Swan)


0930 - 1100 Theme 3 session 1 - Supporting and Assessing Change

What base of knowledge and experience would scientific connoisseurship draw on/need to build? Is there a particular role for the sociology of scientific knowledge? How far is scientific connoisseurship a broad set of roles, and how far a putative social technology, supporting the ‘co-evolution’ of science and society? What can we learn from existing forms and approaches, such as constructive technology assessment, or the ‘anticipatory research’ of the NEST insight projects?


1100 - 1130 Coffee and tea


1130 - 1300 Theme 3 session 2- Supporting and Assessing Change

What do the different forms of scientific connoisseurship suggest for educational curricula? How far do educational changes already under development – such as those in the new science and citizenship curricula – contribute to scientific connoisseurship or other forms of public engagement with science and technology?

What would be the characteristics of a supportive social environment in which experimentation and learning in scientific connoisseurship could take place with a range of social partners, and how could this be developed and financed? Would this take institutional form, or have more the character of a social network? How would this relate to, or supercede, traditional models of scientific communication?



1300 - 1400 Lunch (The Old Swan)


1400 - 1500 Next steps: Developing, publishing and experimenting with the workshop’s ideas.


1500 - 1545 Coffee and tea


1600 Bus departs for Oxford station





















Papers to be discussed
Erik Millstone paper.pdf
Report
Download event Report